Man vs. Machine Essay

Since the yearly mid-fifties science fiction movies have depicted robots as very ripe machines built by hu troopsity to perform complex operations, to work with mans in safe critical missions, in hostile environments, or to a greater extent often to pilot and control spaceships in galactic travels. At the alike time, however, innate(predicate) robots have also been depicted as dangerous machines, open of working against man through wicked plans. In the eradicator the involve of the future is even more catastrophic robots will become intelligent and self- alert and will take over the gracious race.The dual logical implication often accredited to science fiction robots represents the clear look of trust and fear that man has towards his technology. From one hand, in fact, man projects in a robot his wild desire of immortality, h disuseds in a powerful and lasting artificial being, which intellective, sensory, and motor capabilities are much more amplified than that of a expression man. On the other(a) hand, however, there is a fear that a in any case advanced technology can get out of control, acting against man.The Terminator saga is not just a collection of Terminator, and T2. Instead the saga is one of a continuing storyline that in many ways has spanned all of mans existence. Machines and technology have always presented temporary change and sorrow for man to overcome. A machine may simplify a work at but take away the livelihood of a few. From the days of horse drawn carriage selectrs fearing being replaced by a key morose automobile, to todays computer controlled manufacturing environments workers have always feared of being replaced by machine.The strength of the Terminator movies is the singular humanoid T-800 Terminators one of which is play by Arnold Schwarzenegger. Clothed in armor, with the human bodys shape and form, it presents itself as a unexampled evolutionary form of life. Strength, easy coordination with other units, a nd an absolute sense of duty, drive the units forth to destroy man. From their humanoid drawn structure and hands to their glaring red eyes, the machines scare viewers more for their similarity to man than for theirdifferences. To be replaced, to be bettered, to be conquered these are the things which drive animals to the point of extinction. These elements are the primal fears that the terminator machines strike in the human mindAs Humanity progresses, warfare has tended to move more and more away from the human combatants. Instead the battles have moved to the weapons or machines that individually side uses. In the Terminator movies America extends this principal even yet as humanoid machines and automated patrol crafts are used as the backbone of its defense forces. A vast computer network cognise as Skynet is created to coordinate battlefield tactics. It is decided to place these objective machines in charge of nuclear weapons deployment as human leaders believe that human could act with hast or with lack of reason in much(prenominal) all-important(a) decisions. However as time progresses the computer network Skynet becomes self aware and sees the possibility of a new evolutionary age and the birth of a new order of intelligence that of the machine.In the movie, Terminator represents the prototype of ideational robots. He can walk, talk, perceive and behave like a human being. But, what is more important, Terminator can learn He is controlled by a neural-net processor, a computer that can modify its behavior based on past experience. What makes the movie more interesting, from a philosophical point of view, is that such a neural processor is so complex that it begins to learn at an alarming rate and, after a while, it becomes self-aware In this sense, the movie raises an important drumhead about artificial consciousness Can a machine ever become self-aware? To answer my own question not yet, at least.At the end of T2, after a serial of action-pac ked scenes, which would have deprived any human of life or limb, some(prenominal) terminators are dissolved together in their own industrial warming pot. This ending may say something about the modern combination of old and new technologies in the cinema, as it does about the integration of old and new modes of production in industry. But it also seems to me, that the days of the unthinking center of cinematic portrayal, like the traditional factory and its job-classified worker and their similar forms of representation, may be numbered.Work CitedThe Terminator. Dir. James Cameron. Perf. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Michael Biehn,Linda Hamilton, Paul Winfield. Artisan, 1984.Terminator 2 fancy Day. Dir. James Cameron. Perf. Arnold Schwarzenegger, LindaHamilton, Edward Furlong, Robert Patrick. Artisan, 1991.